Bentelbow

Posted by
Lomar [legacy]
Uploaded
11 October 2007 00:00:00
Type
Player Kill

Broke his elbow.

Comments

  • Author
    Tevildo [legacy]
    At
    12 October 2007 17:43:16

    What I meant, Jaron, is that since BKD's 'terms' leave no room for diplomacy, Durmanhoth's are by necessity the same. How they go about achieving it will be the interesting part, if in fact they do.

  • Author
    Manni [legacy]
    At
    12 October 2007 15:39:33

    The rapid pace of the shit talking and flaming just goes to show that there hasn't been one of these knock-down dragged out fights in a long time. This is not how this war is gonna work. This is not something that anyone on either side needs to be flaming about one, two, or three reboots in to.

    There's not going to be a winning side, let alone a winner, in the first few weeks. Everyone needs to man up, shut up, and play for a while. Nobody's earned the right to talk shit yet.

  • Author
    Eigen [legacy]
    At
    12 October 2007 14:53:48

    Baklen, we aren't posting everything either. Only like 1 out of 4 logs.

    And the Durmanhoth members you killed after we started retaliating are around like 4 or 5, while the dwarves you lost to us since then are, what, 23?

  • Author
    Exhalev [legacy]
    At
    12 October 2007 13:55:28

    Funny... all BKD's kills were during the time when Durmanhoth had the no retaliation order. They started trying, and look what happened :)

  • Author
    Baklen [legacy]
    At
    12 October 2007 13:24:34

    The very sad thing is, we don't post all our lame ass gangbangs, the truth is the kill count is pretty even. *shrugs*

  • Author
    Jaron [legacy]
    At
    12 October 2007 09:46:56

    I think that'd be BkD's terms, not Durmanhoth's. Or at least that's the impression I got.

  • Author
    Tevildo [legacy]
    At
    12 October 2007 01:48:32

    In other words, Durmanhoth's terms are also 'this war will last as long as he [Azer] is GM.' At least everyone's in agreement.

  • Author
    Atalash [legacy]
    At
    12 October 2007 00:46:30

    Oh.. right... I always looked at his name as Bentel bow

  • Author
    Hirgail [legacy]
    At
    11 October 2007 23:37:19

    I see what you're doing Manni, trying to get the odds on Durms winning down a bit because you think you'll make a fortune.

    I know your God, His name is Gamblor!

  • Author
    Manni [legacy]
    At
    11 October 2007 23:32:26

    Well there are no terms because of Azer's stance as described below. There's no need to waste time determining what future terms will be if there will never be an accord.

    Anyway, I think a lot of the recent guild 'wars' have been way too quick and bloodless. It'll be good to have a war go all 12 rounds with or without a KO. That hasn't happened in a long time. I don't see the need for it to happen in this case because I think Azer's completely fabricating this 'underlying hatred' or whatever between these two guilds. But since they're intent on pressing the issue, I'm content to try and press back.

  • Author
    Hirgail [legacy]
    At
    11 October 2007 23:32:08

    Azer won't back down and you know it:P You also know that at some point a whole bunch of inactive dwarves will start playing and the tide will turn. In my unbiased opinion, BKD will win in the long run. I'll take bets on that too.

  • Author
    Hirgail [legacy]
    At
    11 October 2007 23:30:24

    Oh man, I just got it. His name IS Bent elbow. Like he's a dwarf and he drinks so much his elbow is always bent.

  • Author
    Lucky [legacy]
    At
    11 October 2007 20:25:57

    What are Durmanhoth's terms? For the outside parties that are bored at work.

  • Author
    Manni [legacy]
    At
    11 October 2007 18:28:36

    Please note that Fyng and Delkin's says represent only their individual opinions and do not represent Durmanhoth's terms for ending this war. It should, however, be noted that Azer has repeatedly stated that this war will last as long as he is GM.