Brubaker

Posted by
Skyman [legacy]
Uploaded
21 December 2008 00:00:00
Type
Misc

Comments

  • Author
    Delvar [legacy]
    At
    24 December 2008 06:01:25

    Smoky lies, don't trust that he/she!

  • Author
    Gramul [legacy]
    At
    24 December 2008 03:08:58

    ahh

  • Author
    Tireless [legacy]
    At
    24 December 2008 02:03:04

    I was speaking in the second person. It's not grammatically correct, but its use in the vernacular is so extensive that I'd almost call it idiomatic :P

  • Author
    Gramul [legacy]
    At
    24 December 2008 01:57:20

    Ahhh, then it was just me it seems

  • Author
    Smoky [legacy]
    At
    24 December 2008 01:53:16

    Delvar namechanged to Duergan.

  • Author
    Gramul [legacy]
    At
    24 December 2008 01:50:23

    hmmm, something i am curious about.

    5. Multiplayer (MP) information

    We do not allow any MP info on this page, whether it be direct or the subtlest of hints. This means that you are not allowed to point out or talk about

    alts on comments or post about them, even your own alts (although more toleration will be shown to goodbye logs). Giving links to any websites that contain

    MP info is also strictly forbidden. Breachers of this rule will be dealt with severely.

    By: Tireless

    The alias to the dunlending camp does not violate rule 4, and it was a legit part of the log. The rule explicitly states that (your) triggers need to be edited.

    My standard is the rules section of the logpage.

    Are you saying that delvar is skyman?

    Especially the (your) thing makes me wonder if you have just violated one of the rules?

    Though, i am sure you haven't, just curious

  • Author
    Shardik [legacy]
    At
    23 December 2008 17:20:01

    I was here. I was unimpressed. Vermond is your daddy.

    Bye.

  • Author
    Daywalker [legacy]
    At
    23 December 2008 17:07:42

    Yo, Manni :) Re-create durms so I get active again:)

  • Author
    Manni [legacy]
    At
    23 December 2008 16:05:38

    Hey Daywalker, how's it going?

  • Author
    Daywalker [legacy]
    At
    23 December 2008 11:48:05

    What's wrong with checking up on old friends :)

  • Author
    Tevildo [legacy]
    At
    23 December 2008 09:11:25

    I think Waste missed his own point, unless I'm totally misreading his comment.

  • Author
    Vermond [legacy]
    At
    23 December 2008 08:33:17

    Did Waste completely miss my point or what? Oh well, fuck it.

  • Author
    Lobo [legacy]
    At
    23 December 2008 07:54:32

    I would have been the best moderator ever.

  • Author
    Urban [legacy]
    At
    23 December 2008 07:35:01

    I'm still wondering why Muaddib hasn't made me a moderator :(

  • Author
    Myrddin [legacy]
    At
    23 December 2008 07:25:47

    If anything, somebody who doesn't log in is in a -better- position to police things here, because they aren't affected by current MUD issues.

  • Author
    Rhoads [legacy]
    At
    23 December 2008 00:28:53

    Erm. I think you are wrong on that Waste. People moderating are blocking people for BREACHING the rules here or going way too far. That has nothing to do with who they are on the mud or whatsoever. One doesn't have to be active to block abusers :p

  • Author
    Smoky [legacy]
    At
    23 December 2008 00:17:27

    Hi Manni.

  • Author
    Manni [legacy]
    At
    23 December 2008 00:03:45

    Nobody really quits the MUD... You are just in remission.

  • Author
    Waste [legacy]
    At
    22 December 2008 23:52:36

    I disagree Vermond, quitting the mud and just checking the log page is not really all that bad. It gives you prospective on stuff which you wouldnt have had you still been playing. Its easier to judge from the outside mind you. Thats why I find it funny that someone who rarely logs on, under his own admission, should have any say on blocking anyone on this page.

  • Author
    Vermond [legacy]
    At
    22 December 2008 23:36:22

    That's funny coming from a guy who posts here despite quitting mud ages ago :P

  • Author
    Daywalker [legacy]
    At
    22 December 2008 22:25:20

    'This is not a company or business. It is just a portal for you mud addicts to share stupid logs or argue endlessly about irrelevant crap instead of getting on with life.'

    Now I understand your motivation:)

  • Author
    Mirnac [legacy]
    At
    22 December 2008 20:25:11

    Why reply to Smoky? Half the log page accounts got 'her' on ignore anyway.

  • Author
    Tireless [legacy]
    At
    22 December 2008 19:59:08

    If I need to I am allowed to interact with morts via mudmail. Activating an account requires no more than _receiving_ a mail, so it should be no problem.

  • Author
    Aslan [legacy]
    At
    22 December 2008 18:48:16

    Are you done? Fuck. Shut up already.

  • Author
    Smoky [legacy]
    At
    22 December 2008 18:14:25

    Oh I thought newbie maia was completely isolated, guess not. Okies.

  • Author
    Vermond [legacy]
    At
    22 December 2008 18:02:43

    He can still read mail, no?

  • Author
    Tireless [legacy]
    At
    22 December 2008 18:02:26

    My average turnaround time for activating accounts is about 4 hours.

  • Author
    Smoky [legacy]
    At
    22 December 2008 17:45:56

    Tireless says, 'Pwipe from orbit, it's the only way.'

    Rank: Newbie Maia (male)

    Last on: 26d 19h 6m 51s ago.

    Age: 23d 6h 17m 28s

    Info: Everyone you meet is fighting a hard battle.

    Plan:

    First: Steal Mathias' Calming Pants.

    Second: Steal Castamir's title (Done)

    Third: Steal Osse's awesome (Done)

    Fourth: Tug Aule's beard (Done)

  • Author
    Vermond [legacy]
    At
    22 December 2008 17:12:57

    Since you started the talk about activating accounts.. I am without mud access during term time, so it is best to mail Tireless as well as me. That is, I will activate the account if I see the mudmail, but there will be periods lasting as long as 10 weeks during which I have no way to check (I'm not going to Starbucks with a laptop to activate your accounts, sorry)

  • Author
    Rhoads [legacy]
    At
    22 December 2008 16:50:44

    I am not an active moderator mind you. I just come to help when some dork gets out of control :p

    I still do not activate accounts! Well, I might, but you would have to wait a lot since my logins are usually 40d or so apart ;p

  • Author
    Sadoc [legacy]
    At
    22 December 2008 16:43:52

    *claps for Vermond*

  • Author
    Grozin [legacy]
    At
    22 December 2008 16:41:58

    omg we all got zinged by vermond :)

  • Author
    Lobo [legacy]
    At
    22 December 2008 16:21:34

    ohhh, so Rhoads IS a moderator still and thus can activate logpage accounts! Mentiroso!

  • Author
    Vermond [legacy]
    At
    22 December 2008 15:49:22

    That was in response to Skyman's comment

    Date: 22. Dec, 2008, 15:18:17 By: Skyman fuck you vermond, watch your logpage die because of lack of users. idiots

    which was removed due to confusion among us. I think my message looks more in context like this. I hope you all get the message.

    Oh and if any of you are feeling rebellious, despite the fact that I've just stated that you can do whatever the fuck you want aside from insulting us, it takes me an average of 5 seconds to block :)

  • Author
    Vermond [legacy]
    At
    22 December 2008 15:44:00

    Let me make this clear at once. This page does not profit from or need any of the posters. Nicuramar pays most of the server costs himself. Tireless, me, Rhoads and other moderators have no gains from moderating despite spending a decent amount of time, getting lynched publicly and dealing with all kinds of idiots.

    This is not a company or business. It is just a portal for you mud addicts to share stupid logs or argue endlessly about irrelevant crap instead of getting on with life. A significant portion of you use that to flame each other and make life miserable for your enemies. A handful of you, like Skyman, use it to inflate your digital egos. That's perfectly fine. I don't give a fuck about what you do as long as you follow a single page of basic rules that have been limited significantly with the recent changes. In fact, it is okay even if you accidentally break a rule - We'll probably just correct the mistake and give you a verbal notice saying what was wrong rather than a block, like what we did with Skyman first.

    But if you go one step further and behave like an immature cunt, do not expect us to put up with it. We simply won't. It is best if you think of this page as a garden party to which you are all invited. If you end up taking shit in the porch and insulting the host, you'll be thrown out.

  • Author
    Lobo [legacy]
    At
    22 December 2008 04:35:20

    *complains about this issue and complains about Vermond too*

  • Author
    Urban [legacy]
    At
    22 December 2008 01:30:37

    Blocking people is just rude :(

  • Author
    Arandur [legacy]
    At
    22 December 2008 01:10:01

    good kill

  • Author
    Vermond [legacy]
    At
    22 December 2008 00:51:32

    I think Tireless' explanation is more than sufficient. Next person to complain about this issue or his admin status will get blocked by me.

  • Author
    Tireless [legacy]
    At
    21 December 2008 23:14:55

    The alias to the dunlending camp does not violate rule 4, and it was a legit part of the log. The rule explicitly states that your triggers need to be edited. My standard is the rules section of the logpage.

  • Author
    Delvar [legacy]
    At
    21 December 2008 21:25:40

    giving Tireless power over anything is a bad idea

  • Author
    Smoky [legacy]
    At
    21 December 2008 21:08:41

    By that standard you should remove this one too because he left dirs to tenzek in...which would just be dumb.

  • Author
    Tireless [legacy]
    At
    21 December 2008 19:41:55

    There was a (small) problem with the Loke log the first time that it went up. I took it down and asked Skyman to fix it. It went back up _with the problem not fixed_ and his little ultimatum in the info. I thought perhaps he hadn't seen the note I left him and consequently thought it was just taken down for shits and giggles. I mudmailed him restating the problem and asking him to fix the current iteration of the log, and told him that if he didn't he was backing me into a corner where either I had to let him walk all over me or I had to take the minimal action available to me (which was way disproportionate to the offense). He was online and aging when I sent the mail. After he had been logged off for two hours I removed the log and issued a warning.

    A few hours later he logged back on and sent me several angry mails both asserting that my standards were inappropriate and claiming that he had in fact complied with my request, but that there were two iterations of the problem (when he entered it and when it went through) and he'd missed one. In response to this I removed his warning and replaced it with a note saying that if he cared to repost the log without the problem line in it he was welcome to do so.

    The issue that got the log taken down is about the most unimportant one there can be; one line (well, two since there's the line where he typed it and where it went through) that needed to be edited or removed. I did not prohibit him from reposting; in fact, I encouraged it. I have no idea why he's getting so bent out of shape over the matter.

    However, if I remove a log and ask someone to change something and then they repost it without changing the problem... what recourse is left to me? If I let it stay I'm saying that it didn't really matter if they listened to me the first time.

    My request that he edit the line was well grounded in rule 4 of the logpage. It hasn't been enforced in this particular situation in a while, but I'm trying to maintain our standards here as best I can.

  • Author
    Gramul [legacy]
    At
    21 December 2008 19:29:37

    hmm, wierd, the Loke log was removed, anyway, i never got to say what i think about this log...

    Good kill!!!

  • Author
    Daywalker [legacy]
    At
    21 December 2008 17:37:50

    Formid, you never even earned the right to discuss PK. You are incompetent.

  • Author
    Smoky [legacy]
    At
    21 December 2008 16:03:21

    Methinks whatever admin removed the Loke log ought to be de-admined.

  • Author
    Formid [legacy]
    At
    21 December 2008 05:08:57

    TBH you sucked right there, he should have had you (he sucked worse so he didn't, no preparation, he could have had your entire party just like Vildoran had your brother, the problem was that he was absolutely insane).

    I'm surprised you, with your huge ego even posted this (ok, sorry, no I'm not, you want to stay on the top posters list).

    I'm glad you posted this tbh, it shows some of the up and coming PKers your true colours (yeah I know, I can't talk, I haven't played in months)!

  • Author
    Sadoc [legacy]
    At
    21 December 2008 02:31:28

    I thought you were warring GB? :P

  • Author
    Trempk [legacy]
    At
    21 December 2008 02:19:16

    He should have just ran straight to an innroom.

  • Author
    Lobo [legacy]
    At
    21 December 2008 01:51:18

    Misc means 'kill' in bulgarian.

  • Author
    Gramul [legacy]
    At
    21 December 2008 01:43:34

    Why did you post it as Misc?