Gangbangs sucks

Posted by
Sartak [legacy]
Uploaded
02 March 2003 00:00:00
Type
Attempt

but reimbursements are better this way :) Damn close call though

Comments

  • Author
    Rhoads [legacy]
    At
    05 March 2003 05:01:07

    My opnion dosen't change, I have been attacked by 3 and more, I dont care.
    Tarn, quiet :P

  • Author
    Delgaur [legacy]
    At
    03 March 2003 14:11:45

    and the fine gold is nothing, like the exp, its far to easy to come by. Moral or immoral

  • Author
    Delgaur [legacy]
    At
    03 March 2003 14:11:20

    thats partly True Denz, however, look at recent guild wars. Kills of 5+ men, resulted in Members leaveing/suiciding becuase they could not take the heat.
    I works in the right situations, and if you just plain get fed up of them sitting on huntbreaks :p

  • Author
    Trempk [legacy]
    At
    03 March 2003 13:53:53

    I commented that on the wrong log, didn't I? heh

  • Author
    Trempk [legacy]
    At
    03 March 2003 03:44:03

    What would have been funny would have been for one of them to lead the party into shelobs and see if she was hungry, hehe.

  • Author
    Tarith [legacy]
    At
    03 March 2003 03:18:42

    If you know its coming, it doesnt matter if its 3 or 8, you can escape. But, thats the trick isnt it? Its the surprise that kills. But still, that doesnt mean its honorable,however, time and again people have demonstrated they really do not give a shit. Suggestions have never limited actions, only rules. Until measures are implemented that restrict how many people you an be attacked by, the argument becomes an exercise in futility.

  • Author
    Denezar [legacy]
    At
    03 March 2003 02:20:23

    Actually, I bet that 90% of all kills never result in anyone thinking 'Damn, I better not mess with those guys again, they'll just gangbang me over and over again.' More likely, it results in 'Gangbanging fags, I'm going to fuck with them every chance i get from now on.' And experience is nothing if you know what you're doing and actually care about leveling.

  • Author
    Delgaur [legacy]
    At
    03 March 2003 01:58:14

    nah - you have the exp loss to.
    And it lets the victim know, that if you fuck with X . Z-Y and his goones will make you think twice about doing it again :).
    and the low fines from attempts normaly only = 1K per person. so you dont get that much.

  • Author
    Martok [legacy]
    At
    03 March 2003 01:49:08

    But Delgaur I mean really, so if you wack someone with 5 people, the reimbursemets outway any damage. Last gangbang I died to, I was reimbursed 10k from one person, and a maxed char's death is only 20k.

    Hence why gangbangs lack skill, lack any real penalty and all they say is you YOU SUCK cause you can't kill me alone.

  • Author
    Martok [legacy]
    At
    03 March 2003 01:46:49

    Anything above 2 is a gangbang, think about it Rhoads, just think a little:)

  • Author
    Nicuramar [legacy]
    At
    03 March 2003 01:39:55

    This is indeed a ridiculous discussion ;-).

  • Author
    Narlg [legacy]
    At
    03 March 2003 00:19:41

    What if he bangs you with 4+? Is it ok then? :P

  • Author
    Kilth [legacy]
    At
    02 March 2003 23:41:22

    And that everyone is prepared to pay eventual fines.

  • Author
    Delgaur [legacy]
    At
    02 March 2003 23:04:14

    I think any number is fine 1 or 10. So long as the the target dies :)

  • Author
    Raqtor [legacy]
    At
    02 March 2003 19:47:55

    Unless its Rhoads. He thinks 3 is ok so he should get it :P Also Rhoads being a paranoid maxed warrior makes him a little harder to solo ;)

    We all agree 3 IS a gang. ;)

  • Author
    Sartak [legacy]
    At
    02 March 2003 19:32:14

    I tend to disagree with you, Crion :p For some unknown reason. hehe
    And I too agree.. 3 men is a gangbang. And gangbangs are bad. If you can't do someone solo or with max 2 people, don't do him. He deserves to live then.

  • Author
    Crion [legacy]
    At
    02 March 2003 19:13:14

    I think he just should have died! ;) Damn him!

  • Author
    Nicuramar [legacy]
    At
    02 March 2003 18:57:10

    Everyone can have their own oppinion on what is a gang bang and what is not, Tarn, Nogothrim, Summem. Rhoads's statements can at most prove ignorance in your books, not retardedness; As much as your statements prove arrogance, I might add ;-).
    I think 3 is a gang bang, but that's just my oppinion of course.

  • Author
    Tarn [legacy]
    At
    02 March 2003 18:23:08

    And Rhoads confirms that he is retarded

  • Author
    Rhoads [legacy]
    At
    02 March 2003 14:34:15

    I still go by solo, 2 man, 3man (being that the max), and gangbang anything above it :P

  • Author
    Nogothrim [legacy]
    At
    02 March 2003 12:54:55

    Solo, 2 man, anything else is a gang bang. To argue otherwise illustrates retardation.

  • Author
    Summem [legacy]
    At
    02 March 2003 08:55:04

    people who dont think 3 people is a gang bang should be removed from mud

  • Author
    Tarn [legacy]
    At
    02 March 2003 08:44:43

    3 people is a gangbang. it always has been

  • Author
    Banhe [legacy]
    At
    02 March 2003 04:35:45

    now I know where is my fucking luck!

  • Author
    Rhoads [legacy]
    At
    02 March 2003 01:53:27

    Of course I didnt saw the figure so my mistake :)

  • Author
    Rhoads [legacy]
    At
    02 March 2003 01:52:56

    Yes, and I agree with you on that Antharn, I hardly think 3 men are gangbangs unless you are a low level char.

  • Author
    Anatharn [legacy]
    At
    02 March 2003 01:19:03

    4 men, Rhoads.. and 4 are a gangbang.. at least I think so.
    Good escape there.

  • Author
    Rhoads [legacy]
    At
    02 March 2003 01:11:58

    3 man a gangbang? you gotta be kidding
    eithery way good scape

  • Author
    Brahm [legacy]
    At
    02 March 2003 01:03:49

    Maybe they were triggered to attack and i was triggered to hunt? No, couldn't be that.
    Its a lot faster than it looks, its only 2 rounds, dumbass.
    I had carrock triggered after my bs. We had all the rhos breaks triggered after the attack, and i had this break triggered right after he used it. And yes, it was due to lack of skill, as are all failed pks.

  • Author
    Tarn [legacy]
    At
    02 March 2003 00:50:58

    Lack of skill?

  • Author
    Nogothrim [legacy]
    At
    02 March 2003 00:29:20

    How could no one have that break triggered!?