When Good Locks Go Bad

Posted by
Scat [legacy]
Uploaded
05 October 2005 00:00:00
Type
Player Kill

Kind of expecting this, but the opportunity was too good to pass up. Sorry, but this is before I figured out how to HTML -> ANSI, so no color.

Comments

  • Author
    Laon [legacy]
    At
    07 October 2005 22:08:06

    I really should log on one day and keel me a drum...

    Btw Scat, U r teh sex

  • Author
    Necsipaal [legacy]
    At
    06 October 2005 14:27:08

    Rating is always biased.

    Who cares?

  • Author
    Duncan [legacy]
    At
    05 October 2005 22:25:43

    Better get shielded (if possible eat something) and fball:P

  • Author
    Boffo [legacy]
    At
    05 October 2005 18:55:01

    I thought it was a fine bit of strategy to start levitating after hitting the lock.

  • Author
    Duncan [legacy]
    At
    05 October 2005 13:52:13

    By: Yamabushi:

    And Isengoire died as soon as he unlevatated. So it was really a solo lock :P

    Er, it was a two man lock up, just one of the men did not shield. Then the other one could have fballed.

    As for rating - this log is a pure 6. Well, perhaps the lack of colour would have flawed it if it was longer. You know, I'm the one who bitches most about colorless logs but this one is excused,

    1 - Because there was a good resaon not to post it in color (i.e. not because Scat didn't care, he just didn't know how to)

    2 - It's not really long so you don't have to read all the travelto in order to understand what's going on.

    I previously saw a log that deserved a pure 6 and you guys underrated it. Really, if you don't want to rate 6 something that deserves a 6, then just don't rate at all, the world won't end without you!

    Not that I know Scat or Yamabushi at all.:P I mean, I'm not biased.

  • Author
    Jabba [legacy]
    At
    05 October 2005 09:48:29

    Jeez, how old are you guys?

  • Author
    Dakar [legacy]
    At
    05 October 2005 04:45:30

    I logged it. I haven't posted, seeing if you will.

  • Author
    Dakar [legacy]
    At
    05 October 2005 04:23:23

    Why don't you post the log where I soloed all of you guild at once Scat? Remember that? Like 30 of you n00bs attempted me at Linhir and I stood there with a wooden sword and killed every one of you. So Scat, until you've got the pubes to fess up, stfu.

  • Author
    Yamabushi [legacy]
    At
    05 October 2005 04:21:31

    Maybe if we were both the same level and had the same gear.

    Oh well, it was a shot. It didn't work and Isengoire died in the whole thing.

    Sometimes it works, sometimes it doesn't.

  • Author
    Scat [legacy]
    At
    05 October 2005 04:14:21

    Yes, a solo lock with you at full HP, neither of us with healing, after landing a stab on me. You and I both know I should have never left that room alive.

  • Author
    Yamabushi [legacy]
    At
    05 October 2005 04:12:01

    You guys even read what the hell a 3 says?

    And Isengoire died as soon as he unlevatated. So it was really a solo lock :P

  • Author
    Pallasch [legacy]
    At
    05 October 2005 04:08:05

    Twice as good as the crap you posted, with your spammy fucking colors and lame, ripped off subs.

  • Author
    Yamabushi [legacy]
    At
    05 October 2005 04:02:11

    I didn't think the log was that good even if it was colored. My eyes are tired of his colorless logs.

  • Author
    Nyx [legacy]
    At
    05 October 2005 03:56:52

    Oh please, critisizing - POST IN COLOUR COS I DON'T HAVE ANYTHING ELSE TO SAY SINCE I GOT OWNED IN THIS LOG. So I'm gonna rate it a 3 cos COLOUR MAKES THE LOG. Or cos I got my ass kicked. You pick.

  • Author
    Yamabushi [legacy]
    At
    05 October 2005 03:09:00

    Learn how to post color.

  • Author
    Dakar [legacy]
    At
    05 October 2005 03:08:39

    It's obviously biased you moron.

  • Author
    Scat [legacy]
    At
    05 October 2005 03:07:40

    Dakar's rating of Yamabushi's last log 3 men taking out 1, quick and efficient? 6.

    Dakar's rating of this log? 1 man taking on two and winning? 2.

    Objectivity at it's finest, I'd say.